Global safe surgery pilot sees deaths reduced

The National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA) issued a patient safety alert earlier this month. It requires all healthcare organisations to implement the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist for every patient undergoing a surgical procedure. The final implementation date is February 2010. This follows dramatic results from a year long global pilot of the WHO checklist in eight countries, including St Mary’s Hospital in London, which saw surgical deaths and complications reduce by one third when the checklist was used.
“The results from the pilot study are startling,” said Dr Atul Gawande, Associate Professor at Harvard School of Public Health and lead for the WHO Safe Surgery project. “They indicate that gaps in teamwork and safety practices in surgery are substantial in countries both rich and poor.  With the annual global volume of surgery now exceeding 234 million, the use of the WHO checklist could reduce deaths and disabilities by millions.  There should be no time wasted in introducing these checklists to help surgical teams do their best work to save lives.”
Sir Liam Donaldson, Chief Medical Officer for England and Chair of WHO World Alliance for Patient Safety, said: “The NPSA’s patient safety alert is critical for introducing safer surgery practices in the UK.  Our aim must be to reduce patient deaths and the level of surgical complications.  By giving our hospitals clear guidelines and a strict timeline for implementing the alert, we are highlighting the importance of patient safety.”
Dr Kevin Cleary, Medical Director, NPSA, said: “The results of the study give clear evidence that a simple intervention leads to dramatic improvement in outcome for patients undergoing surgery.”
He continued: “Patients in the UK undergo more than eight million surgical procedures every year.  From 01 January 2007 to 31 December 2007 129,419 surgical incidents in England and Wales were reported to the NPSA’s Reporting and Learning System.  Over 1,000 resulted in severe harm and 271 resulted in death to the patient. The pilot study has shown we can do much better.”
Health Minister Lord Darzi, who prior to becoming a minister chaired a WHO working group that played a key role in developing the Safe Surgery Checklist, said: “The beauty of the surgical safety checklist is its simplicity and – as a practising surgeon – I would urge surgical teams across the country to use it.  Operating theatres are high-risk environments.  By using the checklist for every operation we are improving team communication, saving lives and helping ensure the highest standard of care for our patients.  The amazing results from the global pilot puts this beyond any doubt.”

More information is available from the NPSA web site >>

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • email
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Print
This entry was posted in Patient Safety. Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Join our mailing list

    Fill in the form below and receive updates and news that we hope you will find interesting.

    * Email
    * First Name
    * Last Name
    * = Required Field
  • Pages

  • Categories

  • Have your say!

    discuss patient identification issuesPlease feel free to add your comments to any of the items you see, we would be delighted to see some debate on the site and to hear your opinion.

    You might also like to submit an article to be included on the site and we would be very grateful for your input. You can do so by emailing us.

  • NPSA

      No dates present
  • NHS Supply Chain helps hospitals choose “which band is best”

    In response to the NPSA safety alert on NHS identification bracelets the NHS Supply chain has created an evaluation sheet designed to aid hospitals when deciding on the correct wristband. The evaluation covers the practicalities of the band, comfort, how long it lasted, ease of use and whether it was resistant to alcohol, soaps and water.

    Click here for a copy of the evaluation form